Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Moderators: YouGotMobjacked, lt.wolf

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby crewu on Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:22 am

Stewie, how on earth do you think you can have it both ways? It was the obvious absence of serious USRowing interest in the lightweight women that made Carlos' attempts so commendable. Sure he had his failures - he stepped up and admitted them and paid the price. But his rookie year results blasted away McLaren's first year results in the US and how does Parker still have a national team job?

You talk about four world championship silver medallists being "Carlossed" and now predict they will all go "balls-up" under the supervision of USRowing because the NGB has not brought the best of the lightweight women together - something that Carlos was able to do far more successfully.

Personally, I think the lightweight women are crazy not to be back in Seattle building on both the successes and lessons learned of 2010. How many world championship medals has Oklahoma City produced in any class of rowing? I'm not sure Ursula is even a certainty to make a US boat if she sticks around there.
crewu
Old timer
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:46 pm

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby ltwtsculler91 on Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:29 am

crewu wrote: I'm not sure Ursula is even a certainty to make a US boat if she sticks around there.


an why should she be a certainty?
sure she owns the 2k ergo record, but that doesnt mean she should for sure be in a boat. there are plenty of other extremely fast lightweight women in this country that potentially could form a faster combo than one with Ursula, which is one of the problems many of us saw with the carlos camp, he was so committed to her and winning with HER it could potentially be destructive and limit making the fastest boat.

who knows maybe in 2012 the fastest 2 lights are current U23s or other younger girls we havent heard of, or maybe we see a goldsack/sarbanis double that kills everyone

theres still time a lot of fast players out there in the light womens field
ltwtsculler91
Pre-Elite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:10 pm

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby Stewie Griffin Should Cox on Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:44 am

You continually miss the point here Crewu.

crewu wrote:Personally, I think the lightweight women are crazy not to be back in Seattle


There therefore must be reasons why THEY made the decision not to be. Not me, not Wolf, not you.

ltwtsculler91 wrote:an why should she be a certainty?


Shes the last person i suspect who thinks she should be a certainty. But its a shame there is not a system that puts all the athletes with an even chance to make the fastest boat possible while being together in an enviroment which is "balanced" in many ways. Yes I know this won't happen
Stewie Griffin Should Cox
Old timer
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby Long'n Strong on Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:45 am

We will see a world-class field at NSR 2
Long'n Strong
Old timer
 
Posts: 2018
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:50 pm
Location: anywhere but there

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby Stewie Griffin Should Cox on Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:50 am

Long'n Strong wrote:We will see a world-class field at NSR 2

Perhaps

But can you guarantee the boat that wins will be the fastest possible combination possible? Or frankly, anywhere close?

I'm not sure. And without that, the boat will qualify but not medal.
Stewie Griffin Should Cox
Old timer
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby Long'n Strong on Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:07 pm

Stewie Griffin Should Cox wrote:
Long'n Strong wrote:We will see a world-class field at NSR 2

Perhaps

But can you guarantee the boat that wins will be the fastest possible combination possible? Or frankly, anywhere close?

I'm not sure. And without that, the boat will qualify but not medal.


No. But the fastest double will win, and will qualify for this year's worlds, and probably qualify the boat for 2012. That's the best that can be expected until USRowing realizes that an Olympic medal is an Olympic medal, regardless of the gender or size of its winners, and starts to support the athletes.
Long'n Strong
Old timer
 
Posts: 2018
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:50 pm
Location: anywhere but there

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby caustic on Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:32 pm

SamG wrote:Thank you Crewu for your opinion. The big difference is that Tim Mclaren is an olympic silver medallist himself who has coached crews to world championship and olympic medals for many years in Australia. His track record is great and his coaching/tactical nous are exceptional. Don't confuse a non result for a crew with the coach's ability in this case.


I can think of a few notable coaches who had almost non-existant rowing pedigrees, or at least lackluster on the elite stage, yet they went on to coach multiple olympic medalling crews and world champions. Don't confuse athletic prowess with understanding of rowing, or of coaching talent.
caustic
Old timer
 
Posts: 2324
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 6:22 pm

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby Long'n Strong on Thu Mar 17, 2011 12:08 am

caustic wrote:
SamG wrote:Thank you Crewu for your opinion. The big difference is that Tim Mclaren is an olympic silver medallist himself who has coached crews to world championship and olympic medals for many years in Australia. His track record is great and his coaching/tactical nous are exceptional. Don't confuse a non result for a crew with the coach's ability in this case.


I can think of a few notable coaches who had almost non-existant rowing pedigrees, or at least lackluster on the elite stage, yet they went on to coach multiple olympic medalling crews and world champions. Don't confuse athletic prowess with understanding of rowing, or of coaching talent.


I wonder - did you ever ride the coaching launch with Carlos? Or with Tim? Have you ever seen one of Tim's successful Australian, British or American crews rowing or racing?
Long'n Strong
Old timer
 
Posts: 2018
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:50 pm
Location: anywhere but there

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby GDI on Thu Mar 17, 2011 1:19 am

Forty Five Pages for an event and athlete who haven't medalled in an Olympic class event in how long??? I could see a debate about the defending Olympic Gold Medalist Women's Eight, but for an event without an established medal winning team??? All the world must be laughing until they risk hernias.

This is akin to a 45 page thread debating the 10th place Pac10 women's basketball team.
GDI
Pre-Elite
 
Posts: 474
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:41 am
Location: Left Coast

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby KiwiCanuck on Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:51 am

GDI wrote:Forty Five Pages for an event and athlete who haven't medalled in an Olympic class event in how long??? I could see a debate about the defending Olympic Gold Medalist Women's Eight, but for an event without an established medal winning team??? All the world must be laughing until they risk hernias.

This is akin to a 45 page thread debating the 10th place Pac10 women's basketball team.


Well, it IS actually amusing...
KiwiCanuck
Pre-Elite
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:57 pm

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby crewu on Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:57 am

Long'n Strong wrote: Have you ever seen one of Tim's successful Australian, British or American crews rowing or racing?

I have not seen any of Tim's successful British or American crews. Are there any?
crewu
Old timer
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:46 pm

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby Stewie Griffin Should Cox on Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:08 am

KiwiCanuck wrote:
GDI wrote:Forty Five Pages for an event and athlete who haven't medalled in an Olympic class event in how long??? I could see a debate about the defending Olympic Gold Medalist Women's Eight, but for an event without an established medal winning team??? All the world must be laughing until they risk hernias.

This is akin to a 45 page thread debating the 10th place Pac10 women's basketball team.


Well, it IS actually amusing...


But just as Afganistan is just the battlefield for the US v Al Qaida, this debate for me as a non American represents a focal point for all that is broken about US Rowing. So although the players maybe Carlos or Ursula etc. It really represents the reason behind why pretty much, the US way under performs on the world stage

All the pieces are represented. Lack of athlete support, lack of coach education, in ability to produce the fastest boat, Private armies without the experience to execute, funding restricted to outstanding athletes or potential medal boats due to simply the baot type.

Yes the worlds laughing for sure, but they are not laughing at this thread, they are laughing at USA seeing the USA continually waste talent and underperform despite having the biggest athlete pool by some considerable margin.
Stewie Griffin Should Cox
Old timer
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby ltwtsculler91 on Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:26 am

Stewie Griffin Should Cox wrote:
KiwiCanuck wrote:
GDI wrote:Forty Five Pages for an event and athlete who haven't medalled in an Olympic class event in how long??? I could see a debate about the defending Olympic Gold Medalist Women's Eight, but for an event without an established medal winning team??? All the world must be laughing until they risk hernias.

This is akin to a 45 page thread debating the 10th place Pac10 women's basketball team.


Well, it IS actually amusing...


But just as Afganistan is just the battlefield for the US v Al Qaida, this debate for me as a non American represents a focal point for all that is broken about US Rowing. So although the players maybe Carlos or Ursula etc. It really represents the reason behind why pretty much, the US way under performs on the world stage

All the pieces are represented. Lack of athlete support, lack of coach education, in ability to produce the fastest boat, Private armies without the experience to execute, funding restricted to outstanding athletes or potential medal boats due to simply the baot type.

Yes the worlds laughing for sure, but they are not laughing at this thread, they are laughing at USA seeing the USA continually waste talent and underperform despite having the biggest athlete pool by some considerable margin.


Did you see the mike teti interview in the last rowing news? He hits on this exactly. Facts are we do underperform
ltwtsculler91
Pre-Elite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:10 pm

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby KitD on Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:39 am

Honest question: How much talent identification gets done by USRowing at the junior level, and what is the outcome?

The US are normally near the top of the table in Junior Worlds each year. Are there any programs to pull out a selected few and concentrate resources on them? If they are just allowed to enter the college system and come out the other end as (hopefully) the complete article, that per se seems a risky strategy given the diversity in standards between the colleges. Maybe there needs to be a subset of univ and college programs under the umbrella of USRowing, geared towards guiding the talent to the national team.

People rightly highlight the level of funding of the GB system, but IMHO where it has been most effective in the last 10 years or so is in finding new junior talent (in some cases, openly stealing it from other sports), and focussing training and coaching effort on them. The number of athletes in the GB system who came into the team via this route is now fairly significant.
KitD
Elite
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Ursula & Abby lw2x for USA

Postby Stewie Griffin Should Cox on Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:49 am

KitD wrote:The US are normally near the top of the table in Junior Worlds each year


In exactly the same events as they win medals at Seniors. M8+ W8+ W4- thats about it....

And there is not a lot else going on

Athlete identification is left in the US to Colleges.
Stewie Griffin Should Cox
Old timer
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:28 pm

PreviousNext

Return to USA National Rowing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests