Moderators: YouGotMobjacked, lt.wolf
crewu wrote: I'm not sure Ursula is even a certainty to make a US boat if she sticks around there.
crewu wrote:Personally, I think the lightweight women are crazy not to be back in Seattle
ltwtsculler91 wrote:an why should she be a certainty?
Long'n Strong wrote:We will see a world-class field at NSR 2
Stewie Griffin Should Cox wrote:Long'n Strong wrote:We will see a world-class field at NSR 2
Perhaps
But can you guarantee the boat that wins will be the fastest possible combination possible? Or frankly, anywhere close?
I'm not sure. And without that, the boat will qualify but not medal.
SamG wrote:Thank you Crewu for your opinion. The big difference is that Tim Mclaren is an olympic silver medallist himself who has coached crews to world championship and olympic medals for many years in Australia. His track record is great and his coaching/tactical nous are exceptional. Don't confuse a non result for a crew with the coach's ability in this case.
caustic wrote:SamG wrote:Thank you Crewu for your opinion. The big difference is that Tim Mclaren is an olympic silver medallist himself who has coached crews to world championship and olympic medals for many years in Australia. His track record is great and his coaching/tactical nous are exceptional. Don't confuse a non result for a crew with the coach's ability in this case.
I can think of a few notable coaches who had almost non-existant rowing pedigrees, or at least lackluster on the elite stage, yet they went on to coach multiple olympic medalling crews and world champions. Don't confuse athletic prowess with understanding of rowing, or of coaching talent.
GDI wrote:Forty Five Pages for an event and athlete who haven't medalled in an Olympic class event in how long??? I could see a debate about the defending Olympic Gold Medalist Women's Eight, but for an event without an established medal winning team??? All the world must be laughing until they risk hernias.
This is akin to a 45 page thread debating the 10th place Pac10 women's basketball team.
Long'n Strong wrote: Have you ever seen one of Tim's successful Australian, British or American crews rowing or racing?
KiwiCanuck wrote:GDI wrote:Forty Five Pages for an event and athlete who haven't medalled in an Olympic class event in how long??? I could see a debate about the defending Olympic Gold Medalist Women's Eight, but for an event without an established medal winning team??? All the world must be laughing until they risk hernias.
This is akin to a 45 page thread debating the 10th place Pac10 women's basketball team.
Well, it IS actually amusing...
Stewie Griffin Should Cox wrote:KiwiCanuck wrote:GDI wrote:Forty Five Pages for an event and athlete who haven't medalled in an Olympic class event in how long??? I could see a debate about the defending Olympic Gold Medalist Women's Eight, but for an event without an established medal winning team??? All the world must be laughing until they risk hernias.
This is akin to a 45 page thread debating the 10th place Pac10 women's basketball team.
Well, it IS actually amusing...
But just as Afganistan is just the battlefield for the US v Al Qaida, this debate for me as a non American represents a focal point for all that is broken about US Rowing. So although the players maybe Carlos or Ursula etc. It really represents the reason behind why pretty much, the US way under performs on the world stage
All the pieces are represented. Lack of athlete support, lack of coach education, in ability to produce the fastest boat, Private armies without the experience to execute, funding restricted to outstanding athletes or potential medal boats due to simply the baot type.
Yes the worlds laughing for sure, but they are not laughing at this thread, they are laughing at USA seeing the USA continually waste talent and underperform despite having the biggest athlete pool by some considerable margin.
KitD wrote:The US are normally near the top of the table in Junior Worlds each year
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests